Impulsive Noise: A Challenge to Measure

Bang! Crack! Pop! Impulsive noise is generated by firearms, hammer strikes and even balloons. Technically, gunshots and explosions (including firecrackers or balloons) produce “impulse” noise, while objects that collide (such as hammers, punch presses and drums) generate “impact” noise.

While the manner of sound generation is different for impulse and impact noise, there are commonalities in the actual waveforms. Collectively, “impulsive” sounds are short in duration yet high in peak amplitude. The total duration of impact noise is generally less than one second, while the duration of an impulse may be less than 10 microseconds. Characteristic of impulsive noise is an initial rising component of the wave, which may only last for a fraction of a millisecond, yet be of extremely high amplitude (see  Figure 1).

These signal characteristics make measurement of impulsive noise challenging. To accurately capture impulsive noise, a measurement system must meet demanding technical specifications. Such specifications include an extremely fast rise time (optimally less than 10 microseconds to peak); a wide dynamic range (with a very high maximum sound pressure level [SPL]); and a frequency response maximum of at least 80kHz.

Commercial sound level meters typically have technical limitations that can result in underestimation of peak SPLs (see chart, below). For example, a measurement microphone of ½” diameter will have a lower maximum SPL and a limited frequency range as compared to a ¼” microphone that is not typically specified for most commercial sound level meters. For an impulsive waveform where an 1/8” microphone yielded a peak level of 184 dB SPL, a ¼” microphone may yield a peak level of 180dB SPL, while a ½” microphone may show a severely underestimated peak level of only 168dB SPL.

Figure 1. Impact Waveform Generated by a Steel Shot Put Ball Hitting a Metal Plate

Failing to meet technical specifications for measuring impulsive noise can result in underestimation of peak SPLs, yielding inaccurate conclusions related to noise exposure.

  • Donald S. Finan, University of Northern Colorado
  • Gregory A. Flamme, Stephenson and Stephenson Research and Consulting
  • Researchers and National Hearing Conservation Association (NHCA) Experts

Visit NHCA at: https://www.hearingconservation.org/

Share on Socials!

Related Articles

Related Articles

Perspectives: Gas Detection

Jeremy DaValle, Training Manager, Industrial Scientific Industrial Hygiene in the Workplace sat down with Jeremy DaValle, Training Manager, Industrial Scientific, to talk about the company’s “Gas ...
Read More

Maximize Safety When Working With Combustible Dust

By: Andy Thomason, Contributor All it takes for a dust explosion to occur at your facility is for oxygen, an ignition source, and a combustible dust ...
Read More

Custom-Molded Hearing Protection in Hearing Conservation Programs

By: Garry Gordon, MS, and Robert M. Traynor, Ed.D., MBA, F-NAP, Contributors In the workplace, when noise levels and exposures exceed OSHA guidelines, industry is required ...
Read More

Follow IHW!

Leaders in Industrial Hygiene

 

AccuTec-IHS
BOWMAN Dispensers, LLC
ENMET
HafcoVac
ILC
Miller Electric
Nilfisk
OHD
SHOWA
TSI

 

Subscribe!

Sign up to receive our industry publications for FREE!

Industrial Hygiene

Construction Safety